CRIMINAL ACTS BY COURTS & JUDGES UNDER ARREST: Conveniently Located In COSTA MESA,CA.

Red Skelton Pledge Red Skelton THERE IS NO VICTIMLESS CRIMES! No Crime, NO FINE! Duly Convicted of a Crime by JURY! Everything else is a KANGAROO COURT! 3/25/2007 Gonzales, Mueller admit FBI broke law, wiretapping. Supreme Court strikes down jail for deadbeat dad Feb 22 2007 5:21PM Associated Press PIERRE, S.D. (AP) The South Dakota Supreme Court has overturned a lower court's order that required a deadbeat dad to spend ten days in jail every time he failed to pay monthly child support. The high court says that penalty was unconstitutional because it amounted to criminal punishment imposed without a trial. The Supreme Court says a circuit judge must re-examine the case to determine the proper penalty for Ed Sazama who was found to owe nearly 63-thousand dollars in past child support for his two children. The circuit judge could impose a different penalty that is aimed at compelling Sazama to pay the child support. But the Supreme Court says if the judge imposes a penalty similar to the original one Sazama must get the constitutional protections of a criminal trial. (By AP Writer Chet Brokaw) (Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.) APNP 02-22-07 1713CST http://www.stoptyranny.info/Northwoods.pdf http://www.stoptyranny.info/Judge-Masturbating.pdf Verdict Coming For "Penis Pump" Judge Closing arguments today in exposure trial of ex-Oklahoma jurist 6/30 UPDATE: After five hours of deliberation, an Oklahoma jury last night convicted Donald Thompson of indecent exposure and recommended that the former judge serve a year in prison on each of four felony counts. His sentencing was scheduled for August 14. The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; This judge gets a jury when he does not deserve said jury trial! IMPEACH HIM, a jury is too good for this criminal! How dare they give this one person a trial by jury when they are acting in a kangaroo court in all other cases.. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE, not costing tax payers one more red cent! The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Section. 6.The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place. Therefore the JUDGE IS NOT IMMUNE TO ARREST BECAUSE THE ONLY PERSONS WHO HAVE LIMITED IMMUNITY is Senators and Representatives, coming and going and while in session, and that is limited. If they commit Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, they maybe arrested in session. A. OATH OF OFFICE I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic: that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. B. AFFIDAVIT AS TO STRIKING AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT I am not participating in any strike against the government of the United States or any agency thereof, and I will not participate while an employee of the Government of the United States or any agency thereof C. AFFIDAVIT AS TO PURCHASE AND SALE OF OFFICE I have not, nor has anyone acting in my behalf, given, transferred, promised or paid any consideration for or in expectation or hope of receiving assistance in securing this appointment. Article III. Section. 1.The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office. Section. 2.The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;-- between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects. In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed. Section. 3.Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted. TITLE 28--JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE PART I--ORGANIZATION OF COURTS CHAPTER 21--GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO COURTS AND JUDGES Sec. 453. Oaths of justices and judges Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: ``I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.'' TITLE 28 > PART I > CHAPTER 17 > § 372. Retirement for disability; substitute judge on failure to retire (a) Any justice or judge of the United States appointed to hold office during good behavior who becomes permanently disabled from performing his duties may retire from regular active service, and the President shall, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoint a successor. Any justice or judge of the United States desiring to retire under this section shall certify to the President his disability in writing. 9. No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. This means ALL JUDGES! The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution. Impeachment is the ONLY crime that maybe charged without a Trial by JURY! http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0121051judge1.html http://www.uscourts.gov/guide/vol2/ch1.html cannon's http://www.uscourts.gov/library/circuitcouncilopinions.pdf Disability link http://www.uscourts.gov/judconf/proceedingsSept06.pdf http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/laws/paperwork-reduction/ http://www.cdt.org/legislation/105th/digsig/govnopaper.html The best way to learn, is with friends, start a meeting! Get a black's law Dictionary Remember nothing but Constitution Counts! Education is EVERYTHING! http://www.familyrightsassociation.com/info/fbi/fbi_color_of_law.htm http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime_file/2007/06/06/2007-06-06_ready_their_jail_cells-2_print.html Ready their jail cells Judge sentenced to 3-to-10; Brooklyn big sent to Rikers BY NANCIE L. KATZ DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER Posted Wednesday, June 6th 2007, 4:00 AM Ex-Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Gerald Garson after being sentenced yesterday to up to 10 years in jail. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disgraced Brooklyn Party big Clarence Norman was ordered to begin own sentence. Two former Brooklyn powerhouses - a Democratic leader and a judge - were led out of court in handcuffs yesterday in a corruption scandal that has prompted calls for sweeping changes in picking jurists. "I am profoundly sorry," cried ex-Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Gerald Garson, 74, who broke into sobs before being sentenced to three to 10 years behind bars for accepting bribes. Garson was convicted of taking cash, cigars, dinners and drinks from a crooked lawyer - all caught on tape - in return for favors. "As I watched the tapes, I was embarrassed and appalled at my demeanor," he sobbed. Just a few hours earlier in the same courtroom, Clarence Norman, the former Brooklyn Democratic Party chairman and 11-term assemblyman, was shackled and ordered to begin a two-to-six-year sentence for campaign corruption. His appeal was rejected last week. "God is good," Norman said, hugging relatives before being shipped off to Rikers Island. The courtroom drama yesterday closed the circle on a four-year probe into judicial corruption by Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes, who began going after Norman when Garson told investigators at his March 2003 arrest that the bench could be bought. No hard evidence has emerged of that yet, but the probe is continuing. Yesterday, in a courtroom packed with family and Brooklyn residents who believed Garson had done them wrong, Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey Berry slammed Garson for tainting the judiciary by allowing crooked lawyer Paul Siminovsky to "sucker him into" giving him lucrative appointments and fixing a case in exchange for thousands of dollars in free meals, drinks, cigars and cash. "What you brought upon yourself is terrible. ... The perception you gave is that justice was being bought," Berry said in an hour-long speech before announcing the sentence. "You should be as pure as the driven snow. You abdicated your judicial responsibility, your moral fiber." Sigal Levi said she no longer has a relationship with her two oldest sons because Garson gave custody to her ex. "Mr. Garson, you sold my children for a very cheap price," said Levi, whose husband pleaded guilty to paying $10,000 to a middleman to gain custody. "You had a moral obligation to protect the welfare of my children. You abused the system and ruined all our lives." Defense attorney Michael Washor asked Berry for leniency, citing Garson's battle with cancer and heart disease, personal tragedies and his bout with alcoholism. But prosecutor Michael Vecchione shot back, branding Garson's courtroom a "vile, corrupt place" that he treated as a personal "piggy bank." Garson does not have to head straight to jail, however. An Appellate Division judge allowed him to stay out of jail on bail pending his appeal. Garson declined to comment. A federal judge ruled in August that the process for selecting state Supreme Court justices - where party bosses pick the candidates - is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt to back-room wheeling and dealing. nkatz@nydailynews.com http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel06/publiccorruption010306.htm Press Release For Immediate Release January 3, 2006 Washington D.C. FBI National Press Office (202) 324-3691 Public Corruption - FBI's Top Criminal Priority Washington, DC - Combating public corruption is the top criminal program investigated by the FBI. Over the last two years, FBI investigations have lead to the conviction of more than 1,060 government employees involved in corrupt activities, to include 177 federal officials, 158 state officials, 360 local officials and more than 365 police officers. The FBI's highly sensitive public corruption investigations focus on all levels of government. No other law enforcement agency has attained the kind of success the FBI has achieved in combatting corruption. This success is due largely to the cooperation and coordination from a number of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies to combat public corruption. These partnerships include, but are not limited to the Department of Justice, Agency Offices of Inspector General; law enforcement agencies' Internal Affairs Divisions; Federal, State and local law enforcement and regulatory investigative agencies; and state and county prosecutor's offices. Additional information about the FBI's public corruption program can be found on the web site www.fbi.gov under the heading?What We Investigate?Public Corruption. | Press Releases | FBI Home Page | 05/02/07 Letter to the Editor on Civil Rights Cases At the same time, we have become more effective by combining sensible investigative and management strategies with preventive efforts to better protect the civil rights and civil liberties guaranteed to all. Personal note here. I have repeatedly shown corruption involving family law cases. The FBI has stated, we'll take you're papers but don't expect us to do a thing, we don't have to prove we are doing anything and you won't get confirmation we are doing crap! Civil rights guaranteed? Accountable to whom? Who as to show that they are doing crap? We're the FBI we don't need no accountability, we don't need no permission to wiretap, we don't need no stinking badges.... Sounds more like up in smoke to me, or is that blowing smoke up my shorts? 03/09/07 FBI Response to DOJ Inspector General's Report on FBI's Use of National Security Letters 03/08/07 FBI Issues Mortgage Fraud Notice in Conjunction With Mortgage Bankers Association 02/16/07 U.S. Contractor Sentenced in case Involving Bribery, Fraud and Money Laundering Scheme in Al-Hillah, Iraq Federal Rulemaking Rules and Forms in Effect Rules in Effect Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (PDF) Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (PDF) Interim Bankruptcy Rules and Official Forms Title 11 U.S. Bankruptcy Code Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (PDF) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (PDF) Federal Rules of Evidence (PDF) Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings Forms in Effect Appellate Forms Bankruptcy Forms Civil Forms USE their books to prove they didn't do their jobs. http://www.familyrightsassociation.com/bin/white_papers-articles/reasonable_efforts/ USE their books to prove they didn't do their jobs. http://www.familyrightsassociation.com/bin/white_papers-articles/reasonable_efforts/ USE their books to prove they didn't do their jobs. http://www.familyrightsassociation.com/bin/white_papers-articles/reasonable_efforts/ http://miami.fbi.gov/statutes/title_42/section14141.htm FBI Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 - Pattern and Practice This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of 1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice. Types of misconduct covered include, among other things: 1. Excessive Force 2. Discriminatory Harassment 3. False Arrest 4. Coercive Sexual Conduct 5. Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests Hate Crimes - Color of Law/Police Misconduct - Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Involuntary Servitude/Slavery and Human Trafficking - Civil Rights Statutes http://www.acnj.org/main.asp?uri=1003&di=964.pdf&dt=4&prnt=no http://www.state.nj.us/dcf/notices/pdfs/RFPTrainingTech.pdf http://www.nccpr.org/issues/1.html http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/cps/cpsd.cfm http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/cps/cps.pdf http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/cps/cpso.cfm#safety http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/factsheets/about.pdf http://www.acf.hhs.gov/j2ee/programs/cb/laws_policies/laws/cwpm/policy_dsp_pf.jsp www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/factsheets/cpswork.pdf Here is what I did when I had to do this years ago.. I took a highlighter and marked everywhere I found a violation. Presented a copy to both the judge (his canons) too.. and asked why they where not following the directions of the job description. I presented it in affidavit form.. and demanded to have my children back. I had committed no crime, and they had not done their jobs and I wanted to wash my hands of the whole thing or face consequences of having me go after them for not doing their jobs. http://www.uscourts.gov/guide/vol2/ch1.html TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 89 > ' 1442 Federal officers or agencies sued or prosecuted (a) A civil action or criminal prosecution commenced in a State court against any of the following may be removed by them to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) The United States or any agency thereof or any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, sued in an official or individual capacity for any act under color of such office or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of the revenue. The biggest abusers and child trafficers are actually HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, and the Social Wreckers! 11 times more likely to be molested, 5 times more likely to be KILLED! Get OFF your APATHY! http://familyrightsassociation.com/info/fbi/fbi_color_of_law.htm http://suncanaa.com/in_memory_ www.guidestar.com curtsy of www.familyrightsassociation.com/departments/legislative/affairs.html IS where you must look for the people in youre story taking emoluments. ($) Constitution: Section. 6. No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. The Good news? Your son is of legal age so CPS has no kind of authority over him now! The Bad news? After years of pointless drug therapies while he was in "care", he's been left a mindless vegetable. See more Get it here- Expose Version 2005 pdf AFRA Special Presentations Saw it here and can't find it now? Hot Spots Archives The contrary view -- that it is the President's constitutional duty not to sign legislation that he believes is unconstitutional -- has been advanced on occasion. For example, Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson advised President Washington in 1791 that the veto power "is the shield provided by the constitution to protect against the invasions of the legislature [of] 1. the rights of the Executive 2. of the Judiciary 3. of the states and state legislatures." Opinion on the Constitutionality of the Bill for Establishing a National Bank (Feb. 15, 1791), reprinted in III The Founders' Constitution 247 (Philip B. Kurland & Ralph Lerner eds. 1987). James Madison appears to have held a similar view and as President once vetoed a bill on constitutional grounds even though he supported it as a matter of policy. See Message to the House of Representatives (Mar. 3, 1817), in I James Richardson (ed.), Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 585 (1896) (while praising the bill's "beneficial objects," Madison wrote that he "ha[d] no option but to withhold [his] signature from it" because he thought it unconstitutional). Jefferson and Madison, however, did not in fact always act on this understanding of the President's duties: in 1803 President Jefferson, with Secretary of State Madison's agreement, signed legislation appropriating funds for the Louisiana Purchase even though Jefferson thought the purchase unconstitutional. See I William M. Goldsmith, The Growth of Presidential Power 438-50 (1974). In light of our constitutional history, we do not believe that the President is under any duty to veto legislation containing a constitutionally infirm provision, although of course it is entirely appropriate for the President to do so. Remember you must state you're violations of Constitution first and then back it up with LAW! (NOT state rules, regulations, laws, and Codes. They are GARBAGE!!!!) NO CRIME Please feel free to share this Educational Information: NO FINE! NO Violation of Rights under color of law! 1. The United States Constitution forbids both the federal and state governments from enacting bills of attainder, in Article 1, Sections 9 and 10, respectively. It was considered an excess or abuse of Royalty, and several of the grievances enumerated in the Declaration of Independence could be characterized as such. A. The general Welfare of the United State, and the Common Defense. Section. 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; Child Support is a letter of Manqui and reprisal to plunder the family. A letter of marque and reprisal was an official who plundered, a private person to take their assets, and was usually used to authorize private parties to raid and capture merchant shipping of an enemy nation. TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 126 > SUBCHAPTER IV > ' 12202 State immunity A State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the United States from an action in [1] Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a violation of this chapter. In any action against a State for a violation of the requirements of this chapter, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in an action against any public or private entity other than a State. Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Amendment III No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. Amendment VIII Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Stripping a parent of their children is cruel and unusual to both the child and parent. United States Constitution main page annotations Amendment XIII Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. Parental rights are so fundamental to the human condition so as to be deemed inalienable. Termination of parental rights equals or exceeds the detriment of criminal sanctions. Section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--.. In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make. The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed. Section. 9. No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. This means ALL JUDGES! TITLE 10--ARMED FORCES Subtitle A--General Military Law PART I--ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERS CHAPTER 15--INSURRECTION Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it-- (1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution. (LET ME REMIND YOU, THE FRINGE ON THE FLAG MEANS YOU ARE UNDER MILITARY LAW!!) TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART II > CHAPTER 47 > SUBCHAPTER X > ' 931 Art. 131. Perjury Any person subject to this chapter who in a judicial proceeding or in a course of justice willfully and corruptly (1) upon a lawful oath or in any form allowed by law to be substituted for an oath, gives any false testimony material to the issue or matter of inquiry; or (2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, subscribes any false statement material to the issue or matter of inquiry; is guilty of perjury and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > ' 2 Principals (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > ' 4 Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > ' 241 Sec. 241. Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-- They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 73 > ' 1509 TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I--CRIMES CHAPTER 73--OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE Sec. 1509. Obstruction of court orders Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. No injunctive or other civil relief against the conduct made criminal by this section shall be denied on the ground that such conduct is a crime. TITLE 18 > PART II > CHAPTER 213 > ' 3282. Offenses not capital (a) In General. Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, no person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any offense, not capital, unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted within five years next after such offense shall have been committed. (b) DNA Profile Indictment. (1) In general. In any indictment for an offense under chapter 109A for which the identity of the accused is unknown, it shall be sufficient to describe the accused as an individual whose name is unknown, but who has a particular DNA profile. (2) Exception. Any indictment described under paragraph (1), which is found not later than 5 years after the offense under chapter 109A is committed, shall not be subject to (A) the limitations period described under subsection (a); and (B) the provisions of chapter 208 until the individual is arrested or served with a summons in connection with the charges contained in the indictment. (3) Defined term. For purposes of this subsection, the term DNA profile means a set of DNA identification characteristics. NO State law. NO state statute. NO state ordinance. NO state regulation. NO state custom. NO state usage. NO state Policy. NO state doctrine. & they can't used unpublished cases against you. City of Sheboygan v. Steven Nytsch, 2006 WI App 191, PFR filed 9/11/06 TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > ' 242 ' 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > ' 242 ' 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 51 > ' 1111. Murder (a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree. Any other murder is murder in the second degree. (b) Within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, Whoever is guilty of murder in the first degree shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life; Whoever is guilty of murder in the second degree, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. (c) For purposes of this section (1) the term assault has the same meaning as given that term in section 113; (2) the term child means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years and is (A) under the perpetrators care or control; or (B) at least six years younger than the perpetrator; (3) the term child abuse means intentionally or knowingly causing death or serious bodily injury to a child; (4) the term pattern or practice of assault or torture means assault or torture engaged in on at least two occasions; (5) the term serious bodily injury has the meaning set forth in section 1365; and (6) the term torture means conduct, whether or not committed under the color of law, that otherwise satisfies the definition set forth in section 2340 (1). TITLE 28 > PART IV> CHAPTER 85 > ' 1343. Civil rights and elective franchise (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: (1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42; (2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent; (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States; (4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress providing for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote. (b) For purposes of this section-- (1) the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a State; and (2) any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 89 > ' 1443 Civil rights cases Any of the following civil actions or criminal prosecutions, commenced in a State court may be removed by the defendant to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) Against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in the courts of such State a right under any law providing for the equal civil rights of citizens of the United States, or of all persons within the jurisdiction thereof; (2) For any act under color of authority derived from any law providing for equal rights, or for refusing to do any act on the ground that it would be inconsistent with such law. TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 89 > ' 1442 Federal officers or agencies sued or prosecuted (a) A civil action or criminal prosecution commenced in a State court against any of the following may be removed by them to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) The United States or any agency thereof or any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, sued in an official or individual capacity for any act under color of such office or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of the revenue. (2) A property holder whose title is derived from any such officer, where such action or prosecution affects the validity of any law of the United States. (3) Any officer of the courts of the United States, for any act under color of office or in the performance of his duties; (4) Any officer of either House of Congress, for any act in the discharge of his official duty under an order of such House. (b) A personal action commenced in any State court by an alien against any citizen of a State who is, or at the time the alleged action accrued was, a civil officer of the United States and is a nonresident of such State, wherein jurisdiction is obtained by the State court by personal service of process, may be removed by the defendant to the district court of the United States for the district and division in which the defendant was served with process. TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > ' 1988. Proceedings in vindication of civil rights (a) Applicability of statutory and common law The jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters conferred on the district courts by the provisions of titles 13, 24, and 70 of the Revised Statutes for the protection of all persons in the United States in their civil rights, and for their vindication, shall be exercised and enforced in conformity with the laws of the United States, so far as such laws are suitable to carry the same into effect; but in all cases where they are not adapted to the object, or are deficient in the provisions necessary to furnish suitable remedies and punish offenses against law, the common law, as modified and changed by the constitution and statutes of the State wherein the court having jurisdiction of such civil or criminal cause is held, so far as the same is not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, shall be extended to and govern the said courts in the trial and disposition of the cause, and, if it is of a criminal nature, in the infliction of punishment on the party found guilty. (b) Attorneys fees In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title, title IX of Public Law 92318 [20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.], the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 [42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.], the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 [42 U.S.C. 2000cc et seq.], title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.], or section 13981 of this title, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorneys fee as part of the costs, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officers judicial capacity such officer shall not be held liable for any costs, including attorneys fees, unless such action was clearly in excess of such officers jurisdiction. (c) Expert fees In awarding an attorneys fee under subsection (b) of this section in any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of section 1981 or 1981a of this title, the court, in its discretion, may include expert fees as part of the attorneys fee. TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > ' 1983 Sec. 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 136 > SUBCHAPTER IX > Part B > ' 14141 ' 14141. Cause of action (a) Unlawful conduct It shall be unlawful for any governmental authority, or any agent thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (b) Civil action by Attorney General Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation of paragraph (1) [1] has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice. [1] So in original. Probably should be subsection (a) of this section. Adamson v. California June 23, 1947., The first ten amendments were proposed and adopted largely because of fear that Government might unduly interfere with prized individual liberties. The people wanted and demanded a Bill of Rights written into their Constitution. The amendments embodying the Bill of Rights were intended to curb all branches of the Federal Government in the fields touched by the amendments -- Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. The Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were pointedly aimed at confining exercise of power by courts. Puckett v. Cox & Gideon v. Wainwright http://www.caught.net/prose/immunity.htm A PRIVATE CITIZEN BE HELD LIABLE UNDER ' 1983 While a private citizen cannot ordinarily be held liable under ' 1983 because that statute requires action under color of state law, if a private citizen conspires with a state actor, then the private citizen is subject to ' 1983 liability. Brokaw v. Mercer County, 235 F.3d 1000 (7th Cir 2001) quoting Bowman v. City of Franklin, 980 F.2d 1104, 1107 (7th Cir. 1992) "To establish ' 1983 liability through a conspiracy theory, a plaintiff must demonstrate that: (1) a state official and private individual(s) reached an understanding to deprive the plaintiff of his constitutional rights, and (2) those individual(s) were willful participants in joint activity with the State or its agents." Fries v. Helsper, 146 F.3d 452, 457 (7th Cir. 1998) (internal quotation and citations omitted). LIST WHO VIOLATED YOUR RIGHTS (YES EVERYONE!) Enter default of defendant (names): _______________________, ________________________, ___________________, ____________________, _____________________, ET AL Respondents, No, further Entry into this case maybe made, default limit is reached. 1. Default entered as requested on (date): Proper service was made (date) ________________ the Federal Rules of court state you have 15 days to respond, and effective failure to respond is now expired at of date date __ 2. Default entered as requested (state reason): Failure to reply. 3. In the Sum of 15,000,000. Per defendant: Violations of Constitution. 4. Memorandum of costs (required if money judgment requested). Costs and disbursements are as follows 5. TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > Sec. 1988. 6. Clerk's filing fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Waived 7. Process server's fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Waived 8. Other (specify): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,000,000.00 per color of law violation 9. Enter default of defendant (names): ___________________________,___________________________, ___________________________, ___________________________, ___________________________, ET AL Respondents, ( Estate of Macias v. Lopez, 42 F. Supp.2d 957, 962 (N.D. Cal. 1999). Per Defendant, Violation of Constitutional rights by custom & policy. TOTAL _______defendants time violotions is the sum of _____________________ Payable in gold or silver per Section. 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Manqui and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS > Rule 12 (e) If the motion is granted and the order of the court is not obeyed within 10 days after notice of the order or within such other time as the court may fix, the court may strike the pleading to which the motion was directed or make such order as it deems just. VII. JUDGMENT > Rule 55 the party against whom judgment by default is sought has appeared in the action, the party (or, if appearing by representative, the party's representative) shall be served with written notice of the application for judgment at least 3 days prior to the hearing on such application. If, in order to enable the court to enter judgment or to carry it into effect, it is necessary to take an account or to determine the amount of damages or to establish the truth of any averment by evidence or to make an investigation of any other matter, the court may conduct such hearings or order such references as it deems necessary and proper and shall accord a right of trial by jury to the parties when and as required by any statute of the United States. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS > Rule 8. Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading e) Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Consistency Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. No technical forms of pleading or motions are required. (f) Construction of Pleadings; All pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice. TITLE 28 > PART II > CHAPTER 40 > ' 595 15 day notice of impeachment TITLE 28 > PART III > CHAPTER 43 > ' 636 Jurisdiction, powers, & assignment magistrate. WE are just pissed off parents who are unwilling to set by while are children are SCREWED! Not Attorneys (no way no how could we be that corrupt!) LARRY JAMES HANSHEW, SUI JURIS Web: http://www.actnowinc.net E-mail: http://www.actnowinc@sbcglobal.net Phone: *82-(949)-548-0403 group http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/ncp-ca-orange